Contents
Economic Nationalism: Parallels Between the 1920s and 2020s
The Shadow of History
The global economy is presently grappling with deepening rifts, akin to those that led to "economic nationalism," a downturn in worldwide trade, and the Great Depression of the 1920s. Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank, has issued a caution on this front.
“We have faced the worst pandemic since the 1920s, the worst conflict in Europe since the 1940s, and the worst energy shock since the 1970s.”
These disruptions combined with supply chain issues have fundamentally altered global economic activities.
Echoes of the Past
In a speech at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Washington, two days after the Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 50 basis points, Lagarde drew comparisons between the two decades. “Several parallels between the ‘two twenties’ — the 1920s and 2020s — stand out,” she noted. Among these are setbacks in global trade integration and technological advances.
Monetary Policy and Historical Lessons
Learning from the Past
During the 1920s, monetary policy exacerbated problems. The adherence to the gold standard led to deflation and banking crises. Lagarde emphasised that pegging currency to gold was not robust in times of profound change. It forced the world into deflation, contributing to economic malaise and a cycle of economic nationalism.
Modern Tools
Today, central bankers possess better tools to manage these changes. Lagarde credited these tools with maintaining price stability. For instance, inflation fell quickly once central banks raised rates in 2022. Notably, consumer prices had surged due to post-pandemic demand, supply chain disruptions, and energy price hikes following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Inflation and Employment Triumphs
A Remarkable Achievement
The swift containment of inflation within two years, without a spike in joblessness, is remarkable. “It is rare to avoid a major deterioration in employment when central banks raise rates in response to high energy prices,” Lagarde remarked. Eurozone employment, in fact, grew by 2.8 million people since the end of 2022.
A Stress Test for Policy
She further described this episode as an extreme stress test for monetary policy. Central bankers have been able to ease monetary policy in recent months as price pressures abated. For example, inflation in the Eurozone peaked at 10.6% in October 2022 but fell to a three-year low of 2.2% in August.
Future Challenges and Strategy Review
Remaining Vigilant
However, Lagarde warned against complacency. Issues such as setbacks to globalisation, partial disintegration of supply chains, and the market power of tech giants like Google could test central bankers. Additionally, the rapid development of artificial intelligence adds to the complexity.
Managing Uncertainty
Uncertainty will likely remain high, and managing it better is crucial. The ECB plans to delve into these issues in its upcoming strategy review. While its 2% medium-term inflation target won’t be scrutinised, the ECB will consider past experiences with too-low and too-high inflation.
“We need to manage it better.”
– Christine Lagarde
Disclosure and Risk Management
The ECB will also focus on its assessment and disclosure of risks. For instance, its baseline inflation scenario may be balanced with real-time information. There could be alternative scenarios disclosed by the central bank.
Conclusion
In sum, while today’s central bankers are equipped with more effective tools than their predecessors, the future remains fraught with challenges. The lessons from the 1920s remind us that economic stability requires vigilant and adaptive monetary policy.
For those interested in regular updates on global economic matters, consider signing up for the Global Economy myFT Digest to receive insights directly in your inbox.
By understanding the parallels between the 1920s and 2020s, we can better navigate the uncertainties of the present day while avoiding past pitfalls. Sign up today to stay informed and ahead of the curve.
