The Erosion of SNAP: A British Perspective
The Trump administration, with its allies in Congress, has shifted resources from those who need them most to the wealthiest. One way they’ve done this is by undermining one of the most successful anti-poverty initiatives in history.
Effects of the “Big Ugly Bill”
More than 22 million American families are poised to lose nutrition assistance benefits. Astonishingly, over 3 million individuals will be removed from SNAP in its first year.
SNAP’s Positive Impact
SNAP has been a lifeline during economic downturns. For every dollar spent, it generates $1.80 in economic activity. Moreover, it alleviates poverty for children and families of color. In 2023, two-thirds of individuals lifted from poverty were people of color, nearly 40% of whom were children.
Disproportionate Impact on Families of Color
Families of color are twice as likely to depend on SNAP compared to their white peers. With cuts looming, these families face greater hardship due to restrictive policies.
Economic Consequences
Reductions in SNAP could lead to job loss and budget shortfalls, while also closing thousands of grocery stores.
SNAP Cuts in Detail
The legislation slashes SNAP through several measures:
- Decreasing federal contributions and cutting food benefits by up to 25%.
- Expanding red tape and work requirements.
- Ending assistance for 120,000 to 250,000 legal immigrants.
- Freezing the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Thrifty Food Plan.
The Importance of SNAP
When unemployment rises or wages don’t keep pace, SNAP acts as a buffer, preserving purchasing power and aiding economic stability. Cutting SNAP would negate gains achieved during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, where emergency allotments helped many families face inflation and job losses.
Work and SNAP Participation
Contrary to claims, many SNAP recipients are indeed working. About 89% of households with children have at least one working adult. These individuals rely on SNAP to supplement their basic needs and remain employed.
The Broader Picture
The Trump administration’s policies have led to economic challenges, with issues such as rising prices and increased Black unemployment.
A Call for Compassion and Policy
Cutting nutrition assistance is both morally wrong and economically unwise. A robust SNAP program supports local businesses, stabilizes economies during downturns, and fosters future prosperity. Strengthening it is not just compassionate but sound economic practice.
i>Marc H. Morial is president of the National Urban League and former mayor of New Orleans. He contributes twice a month to the Sun-Times.